The United Nations and Helpers Aim to Destroy Christianity

by Jane Gaffin

A 100-foot-tall statue of Christ the Redeemer, his inviting arms opened 92-feet wide, has kept a kindly presence over his flock from atop Corcovado Mountain since the famous Rio de Janeiro landmark’s official lighting ceremony of October 12, 1931.

Somehow, supposedly tampering with the illuminating rods, the icon that reverently symbolizes Brazilian Christianity ended up flooded with garish green lights during the United Nations (UN) 10-day Rio+20  jabberwocky in late June, 2012.

One would think that when ill-mannered Marxist brats are guests in someone else’s house they could at least refrain from trashing sacred art objects.

As noted by esteemed writer Alex Newman of New American, shortly before the conference’s official opening, green legend James Lovelock — the “scientist” and environmental guru who initially introduced the whole UN “Gaia” concept to be worshipped as a one-world religious symbol — warned that the “green religion” was going to sink Christianity.

Understandably, UN critics and many Christians were outraged.

Shedding light on the matter, Newman expounded in The Real Agenda Behind UN “Sustainability” Unmasked that “Lord Christopher Monckton, a policy advisor to former U.K. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and one of the most well-known opponents of the UN’s supposed environmental agenda, called it (the green stunt) ‘a kind of childish message that the environmental religion is now replacing Christianity,’ ”

More powerful men than James Lovelock and Simon Fish, vice president of Toronto-based BMO Financial Group, have tried unsuccessfully to wipe out Christianity for 2,000 years.

Throughout various pockets of history, Christianity has been pushed underground, even as recently as Hitler’s Nazi Germany, Stalin’s Soviet Union and Mao’s “Let a Hundred Flowers Bloom” Campaign that flushed out dissidents opposed to party ideology. The clergy was either executed or banished to hard-labour camps where many died.

But Christianity didn’t die. The spirit of God lives within people’s souls and cannot be killed.

Presently, in China, Christianity is booming, propelling the country toward becoming the world’s largest Christian nation.

A groundswell of multimillions of Protestants/Catholics/Unknowns out of a possible 1.3 billion population have the momentum going to scare the pants off members of the Communist Party who seem to realize the futility in trying to wipe out Christianity by simply toppling man-made crosses from steeples and razing stone-and-mortar buildings.

Brave Chinese Christians simply put everything back in place and wait to be arrested or for the next demolition crew to show up. So far, the only imaginative crackdown remedy President Xi could conjure up is the threat to “nationalize” the surging religion to bring Chinese Christianity into compliance with the “party line”.

Concurrently, Xi’s neighbour, Russian President Vladimir Putin seems to be cultivating Christianity into his country’s prime religion.

While Christianity gains popularity in Communist-based countries, Canada is hell bent on dumping Christianity.

That fact did not escape President Putin: “We see that many Euro-Atlantic (the Western) States have taken the way where they deny or reject their own roots, including their Christian roots which form the basis of Western civilisation.”

Canada is “following politically-correct orders” from the United Nations, the international organization that has to destroy Christianity and the Bible to eliminate the supreme, God-based constitutions governing legitimate governments of the Western World that clash with the United Nations Charter.

Under the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, an obscure Army manual cites the Christian Bible as one item that can find a person categorized as “terrorist”, “racist” or “mentally ill”. If not murdered for the transgression, the “sinner” will be forever institutionalized as a certifiable nut case.

Therefore, Christianity has to be eradicated to easily sell the masses on the ideology that national constitutions and their Bill of Rights are outmoded folly. In the Western civilization, people’s liberties and freedoms are protected as natural, God-given, inalienable rights, rooted firmly in British Common Law, Bill of Rights of 1689 and the Magna Carta of 1215, which has withstood the test of time for 800 years this June 15th.

However, through brainwashing and the gradual erosion of morality, integrity and spirituality the Marxists intend to break the back of freedom-loving countries. Carrying out the job for the United Nations are innumerable political puppets, the willing types referred to by Russian revolutionist Vladimir Lenin as “useful idiots”.

Alex Newman explains the double-dealing that goes on in the UN underbelly in his December 31, 2014 New American piece, UN Seeks to Criminalize Free Speech:

“Even the whole UN notion of ‘human rights’ should be viewed for what it is: a tool of tyrants to attack the real rights that have underpinned Western traditions since the Magna Carta.

“Indeed, unbeknownst to average Americans and humanity as a whole, the UN means something very different when it discusses ‘human rights’ than, say, the unalienable, God-given rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.

“In the American system, rights such as self-defense, free speech, religious liberty, trial by jury, privacy, and property ownership are endowed by the Creator upon every individual — a truth that America’s Founding Fathers viewed as “self-evident.”

Everyone — Christian or not — has a huge stake in Christianity, declared the sage columnist Dr. Paul Craig Roberts in his powerful Christmas: The Greatest Gift for All message “Whether or not we are individually believers in Christ, we are beneficiaries of the moral doctrine…”

The latest Antichrist travesty has come from the Canadian banks, owned by Canadians, the majority Christian Canadians.

I’m doing my darndest to separate the Bank of Montreal, where I’ve done business for 48 years, dating back to when banks acted like banks, from the BMO Financial Group.

Bank lawyer, Simon Fish, seems to feel there’s nothing that quite needs reforming so much as other people’s habits and beliefs. He is trying to blackmail Christians into changing their conduct code, otherwise the banks and some 70 plus Canadian corporations will see that those people are ban from finding employment anywhere in Canada, starting with professionals such as lawyers, physicians, teachers and trickling down the list to tradesmen, labourers and service workers.

The burr under Fish’s saddle started with the private, 4,000-student Trinity Western University (TWU) at Langley, British Columbia, where students practice morality and good character in their daily lives.

The faculty and students believe strongly that marriage is between a man and a woman and are committed to family values. They shun Marxist ideology of “free love” and promiscuous sex.

Fish, who probably received his marching orders from the CEO and Board, attached his signature to a March 26, 2014 letter advising the Law Society of Upper Canada to not grant accreditation to lawyers degreed at Trinity Western University.

The law societies of Nova Scotia and British Columbia, in a backflip, came onside. To date, law societies in all other Canadian jurisdictions are granting membership to TWU law graduates, but not for long if the intolerant Canadian banks get their way.

University of Ottawa-degreed lawyer Albertos Polizogopoulos, who holds to Christian beliefs, outlined in his January 9, 2015 article Christian Lawyers and Doctors Need Not Apply:

“TWU, which exists to ‘develop godly Christian leaders’ in a variety of marketplaces, requires its students and staff to sign a Community Covenant.

“This pledge, based on religious beliefs, to abstain from certain activities and behaviours during their time at TWU, includes the use of alcohol on campus, viewing pornography, and ‘sexual intimacy that violates the sacredness of marriage between a man and a woman.’

“…a concerted effort to block TWU’s law school was engaged by lawyers’ professional associations deciding to disapprove of its graduates.

“The Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society, the (Ontario) Law Society of Upper Canada and the Law Society of British Columbia each decided to refuse admission to TWU graduates to the practice of law because of TWU’s adherence to the biblical view of marriage.

“To do so, these law societies chose to disregard the Supreme Court of Canada’s 2001 decision, which ruled that a professional body could not refuse to accredit students from a TWU program because of TWU’s Community Covenant.”

In rendering the 2001 decision, Canada’s top court cited a raftload of passages from the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Further, to be brought to the attention of BMO Financial Group and its supporters, is the Mobility Rights 6(2)(b), which was not at issue in Trinity Western University v. British Columbia College of Teachers, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 772, 2001 SCC 31.

“Every citizen of Canada and every person who has the status of a permanent resident of Canada has the right to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province.”

These politically-correct witchhunters, an extreme madman practice I thought went out of fashion in Salem in 1693, need to view remarks posted by TWU graduates and others in response to certain articles, specifically the Vancouver Sun’s Proposed Christian Law School at Trinity Western Under Fire Because of University’s Anti-Gay Rules.

Respondents varied in skin colouring; admitted homosexuality; or spoke of following non-Christian religious persuasions. The common denominator, however, was their enjoying and appreciating their time on TWU’s campus.

So what’s the problem? What’s wrong with aspiring to be a good person?

TWU does not reject applicants as long as they adhere to house rules like the ones by which offsprings must abide as long as they live under their parents’ roof. If the applicants don’t like the rules, they are free to enroll at any of Canada’s public law schools.

Why are the bloodthirsty Marxist busybodies whipping up a frenzy to protect students from discrimination who don’t seem to be suffering discrimination? Students posting comments did not sound like they needed or wanted outside interference.

The next time a customer service rep coos sweetly at me, “I see from your account that you don’t have a BMO Mastercard, and they’re so-o-o handy”, I have a souvenir to hand to the rep to read and share with bank colleagues.

It’s a three-pager, penned by long-time BMO customer Lou Iacobelli of Toronto, headed “Why I Will Be Cancelling My BMO Mastercard”. It spells out the sordid mess that is not a BMO Financial Group banking matter, but starkly defines a discriminatory policy that smacks of Christian bigotry.

Whereas corporations have the right to make whatever internal policies they want, I have the option to obtain a credit card from a source not connected to any of the five major Canadian banks.

The central Bank of Canada has a mandate to hold Canadians’ money in Trust, keeping it safe and secure, which is what renders the Canadian banking system the envy of the world.

My gold-plated suggestion is that the banks bow out of meddling in matters of sexuality, ethnicity and religion and get back to tending to the business of banking, thus ensuring that debts incurred gambling on the derivatives, currency and mortgage markets can be covered without having to rob middle-class depositors’ accounts and pension funds to cover losses when the bubbles pop.

Goodness is the only investment that will never fail you.

Practice it, BMO!

*******

Advertisements

Video: The Systematic Elimination Of Private Property

by Jane Gaffin
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2014/05/04/the-systematic-elimination-of-private-property/

Private property ownership, the cornerstone of democracy, is the heart of all other rights and freedoms.

Without the right to own private property, other rights and freedoms are worthless: the right to vote, the right to religion, the right to peaceful assembly and association, the right to freedom of expression and thought, the right to mobility.

In other words, without the rights to individually own and control personal and real property, the rights to life, liberty, security of person and due process of the law — everything –is surrendered to the autocrats.

Without inalienable rights and freedoms endorsed by a nation’s constitution citizens are reduced to human property owned by the state.

The quickest way to individual ruination is through the nationalization of land and mass people-control which is manipulated by a very few universal powermongers who have more wealth already than they can use in a lifetime but continue demanding that the individual citizen contribute more.

First, the government kleptocrats take all the people’s money from their bank accounts, then all their lands to render them unproductive paupers with no home of one’s own, then make them and their children servants forevermore.

Above and below is the Oathkeeper URL for an insightful 18.5-minute Liberty Northwest News presentation that also can be watched on such places as YouTube or the Ask search engine.

In The Systematic Elimination of Private Property, New Mexico rancher Wayne Price provides testimony to the abuses he and other ranchers have suffered over the last many years at the hands of the United Nations Agenda 21 land-grab movement and the government minions who bear no qualms about carrying out the orders.

Mr. Price, who comes from a long line of heart-breaking experiences fighting government encroachments against his private property rights, gave this interview when he came in support of the Bundy family who were under siege at Bunkerville, Nevada, near Las Vegas, in April, 2014.

As soon as he arrived at the Bundys’ Bunkerville ranch, he realized no national media outlet was covering the government’s unconstitutional attack on U.S. citizens. Mr. Price called Alex Jones at his InfoWars command center in the Texas capital city of Austin, the showcase of Agenda 21 implementation.

The astute Mr. Jones heads up a dominant alternative media source and quickly recognized the federal government’s unprovoked assault on the Bundy-owned ranch and the grazing rights dispute on public lands as Agenda 21 personified.

Perhaps a culmination of reasons spurred Mr. Jones to immediate action. While chomping at the bit to be at the center of action himself, Mr. Jones was otherwise personally committed.

Able to spare a two-man crew, he dispatched journalist extraordinaire David Knight and cameraman Josh Owens who seemed to magically appear in several places at once, covering all bases of action that was beamed back to the Austin command center for worldwide distribution.

It was InfoWars broadcasts that incited the corporate-owned media to move its lazy arses. None of those major media presstitutes had ever heard of, much less mentioned, Agenda 21. Most commentators moronically spewed and spun political-correct rubbish and rhetoric without an iota of comprehension of what they were dealing with for truth.

The exception was Fox Broadcasting. Nevertheless, nobody there ever referred to the situation by its real name, either: Agenda 21.

In the video, Mr. Price speaks of being too traditional at first to accept what was happening to him over the encroachment on his land. He just wanted to “go along to get along” (a.k.a. Agenda 21 jargon).

Eventually, he listened to his son and discovered his problems stemmed from the fraudulent United Nations Agenda 21, an abomination born in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 as an environmental lie.

Agenda 21 is a blueprint for how society will exist and behave in the 21st Century. Regardless of which path is followed in the labyrinthian framework all passages lead to formation of a totalitarian one-world government.

The plot was masterminded by a small coterie of mad global elites under the environmental guise of “saving the planet” for every “endangered” species that are purported to be more important than humans.

Therefore, land-grabbing is high on the list of Agenda 21 implementation.

Mr. Price talks about why one New Mexico rancher was eventually sprung loose from his incarceration in a federal “re-education” gulag while another rancher languishes in what might truly be one of those FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) “re-education” camps.

Due to the Agenda 21 system, farmers and ranchers are being forced off their land in the name of “environmentalism” to give way to the rabid greens’ moneymaking scheme of Rewilding America.

Mr. Price knows what he is talking about. Therefore, I implore you, if you don’t do another blessed thing today, please watch this video presentation by Northwest Liberty News on Oathkeepers or on YouTube or on Ask.com or wherever you like. You still have a smidgin of free choice remaining.

Every word, every thought presented by the interviewee is absolutely true. He’s lived through Agenda 21, Biodiversity Project (a.k.a. Agenda 21), Wildlife Program (a.k.a. Agenda 21), sustainability (a.k.a Agenda 21), private-public partnership (a.k.a. Agenda 21); Endangered Species (a.k.a. Agenda 21).

It all ties together in a complex lattice work.

Under Agenda 21, people will no longer be allowed to eat red meat, thus no more reason for cattle, thus no more reason for water rights, thus no more reason for farmers and ranchers to live on and own land or have benefits of exercising grazing rights.

Governments everywhere are forcing property owners off the land into high-density “stack’em and pack’em” ghettos.

Please take 18.5 minutes out of your life to listen to this man of the land who has lived this nightmare. You will learn more than you want to know.

Then pass this video on to all your friends, whether you think they will be interested or not. They may think they aren’t interested now. But they soon will be when they discover they, too, are prohibited from owning titled and personal property — not a car or a bike, not even a Smart Phone.

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2014/05/04/the-systematic-elimination-of-private-property/

or see: http://www.ask.com/youtube?qsrc=1&o=0&l=dir&q=the+systematic+elimination+of+private+property

 

A War of Wills: Agenda 21 Can Be Crushed

 

by Jane Gaffin

“Sustainability”, “stakeholder”, “partnership”, “stewardship”, “environmental” (this or that), “community planning”, “municipal funding” and a host of other innocuous-sounding, politically-correct terms are spinoffs from the United Nations (UN) Agenda 21, a pervasive, conspiratorial system absorbing all constitutional-rights systems.

Bluntly put, Agenda 21 spells totalitarianism, which, in its final form, means the State demands to exercise total control over the individual.

Yet the essence of a free life is supposed to mean the right to choose the style of living one prefers. Under the rule of Agenda 21, you can forget freedoms of everything.

Whether that tyrannical system of governance follows the brutal doctrine of Marxism, communism, Nazism, fascism, environmentalism or the Evil Eye doesn’t matter a whit. The difference between these political theories is infinitesimally small as to not matter one iota. All of them want everything good banned, including the teaching of minion workers to count beyond 100.

The significant part to this type Marxoid gibberish is that the top kleptocratic potentate, and the cabal of quislings who help the psychotic in his quest to be Top Dawg, desires to own every individual’s body, brain, soul and schedule.

Agenda 21 is the root rot at the base of every contentious issue and controversy facing the world today. To wage an effective fight against any of these politically-correct policies or problems is like trying to nail jelly to the wall unless people clearly understand what Agenda 21 is all about.

Then, and only then, can that indescribable evil be slain. Otherwise, it will continue expanding like a great omnipresent ameba that it is.

This odious, complexly-structured blueprint serves a United Nations (UN) social engineering cult in ruling the masses in the 21st century. It is a ghastly cradle-to-grave, people-control plot, which, prevalent since the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, is about making people’s lives miserable.

Yet most people claim never to have heard of the noxious Agenda 21 that is unfolding in front of their closed eyes.

One reason most people think they haven’t heard of it is because the corporate-owned, propagandizing mediots and presstitutes have been directed by the powers-that-be not to address the nightmare by name that is consuming humanity from every direction, every second of every day.

Regardless, Agenda 21 is not a huge secret. Information is readily available on the Internet and in print. And it was the unprecedented Internet technology that was the unintended wild card that somewhat stemmed Agenda 21’s early rapid progress by assisting greatly in educating at least a portion of the public.

Therefore, the “aggrieved” UN wants total control over the Internet in 2015 so it can tax every common user out of existence. But this will no doubt backfire. It is highly probable that at this very moment brainy entrepreneurial technocrats are busy with the feasible development of a counter network to offset whatever the UN steals.

However, the problem with the Agenda 21 literature is that the material is presented in deceitful Orwellian Double Speak language to make the New World Order sound peaceful, environmentally-friendly and conducive to people living happily ever after in a Utopian society.

Nothing could be further from the truth. In comparison to what Agenda 21 has in store for world populations actually makes the iron-fisted North Korean police state appear as enticing as a sweet, dazzling paradise.

Astute freelance writer and editor Daisy Luther at The Organic Prepper has read between the lines of the 300-page action plan titled Earth Summit Agenda 21: The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio and submitted her truthful interpretations to the world-at-large.

Her insightful, starter-kit essay, Agenda 21: Full Spectrum Domination and related posts have concisely boiled down an ultra-complex subject that will help the beginner get the drift of what governments are dumping on our heads everyday in our countries, our communities and subtly destroying everybody’s lives.

“The peace-loving tree huggers at the UN have devised a plan for the world,” her February 28, 2012 piece begins.

“The friendly folks at the UN’s Department for Sustainable Development have a master plan for us all.

“Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.

“So let’s see if we understand this correctly. A plan of action. Got it.

“To be taken globally…okay – everyone must participate.

“In every area in which human impacts on the environment….yep, that covers everyone and everything in the entire world. It’s a warm fuzzy way to take over the world!

“Group hug, anyone?”

She covers sections on how the “action plan” impacts Social and Economic Dimensions; Conservation and Management of Resources for Development; and Strengthening the Role of Major Groups.

Oh, joy. The Means of Implementation is the bellringer.

“This section,” writes Ms. Luther, “describes how to get the whole world on board the happy train to Agenda 21-land.

“Redistribution of financial resources (i.e., taking it away from some and sharing it among others), technology (public transit, “equal” distribution of energy usage, monitoring of behaviours through big brother technologies) science and environmentalism (removing people from rural areas to “save” the natural resources from pollution and mismanagement), re-education (brainwashing with propaganda) and restructuring of local governments (installing puppet leaders).

She warns that all this peace and love Agenda 21 claptrap does not focus strictly on third-world countries either; the developed countries of North America and Europe are part and parcel of the reverse Robin Hood theme of “steal from the poor, give to the rich” and doing it at “warp speed”.

With the decline of the American farm, people are being funnelled into the cities in search of work. With the decline of the economy, fewer people can afford private transportation and are therefore limited to the places that public transit will take them.

“Support of the local down-trodden is geared to further incite class warfare. Separation of families through child protection agencies, big brother parenting, and the dumbing down of our education system is planned to break down our society even further. Publicly funded health care will dictate toxic vaccinations, secretive sterilization, eugenics of the elderly and less-productive members of society, and mandated birth control.”

The writer gets it. She sees very clearly that nothing–but nothing–has escaped Agenda 21’s Full Spectrum Domination by the 1%.

“It guarantees both birth control and death control. It promises the basic essentials of life in return for submission. It exchanges critical thinking for re-education and brainwashing.

“It destroys the epicenter of the family, society and culture, allowing only one way to live. It groups the population into small contained areas to be more easily controlled. It takes away from some to give to others who will be more easily managed by the promise of a full belly and a warm shelter.

“It’s a parasitical representation of the 1%, feeding on the 99.”

As seen in Daisy Luthur’s analysis, the Agenda 21 powermongers don’t intend to use the UN to curb tyranny around the world but rather to create it…which is presently in full cry as the United States lapdog carries out the honours.

Everybody is subjected to the Marxist fallout from the United Nations’ Agenda 21, and they are expected to participate as blind believers at the federal, provincial, state, municipal and school board levels, which covers everything from which lightbulb you must buy to the banning of children’s lemonade stands.

In Marxist fashion, private land ownership is taboo as is the family unit. To meet Agenda 21’s objectives, the planet must be cleansed of capitalism and the affluent middle class. This critical societal layer, which comprises the educated, innovative and productive, is very dangerous to fresh wannabe despots coming out of the closet.

Survivors will be relocated into human “stack’em ‘em and pack‘em” concentration ghettos that are reminiscent of the depressing habitat for humanity concrete apartment blocks of Soviet Russia.

The masses will be denied any benefits and amenities that once served human convenience. To further meet the Nazi “law of life” objectives in which people’s bodies are state-owned, Christianity will be destroyed.

The health-care system is already categorizing anybody who owns or reads a Christian Bible as “mentally ill” and has targeted those “heretics” as “potential terrorists”, who will be dealt with according to the same harsh rules prescribed for gun owners, smokers, drinkers, libertarians, as well as those sporting body tattoos and dyeing their hair artificial colours.

“Saving the earth” is the monotonous mantra. Whoever controls the land and other natural resources controls nations; whoever controls the food supply controls the people.

To date, it looks like government and mega-corporations are winning on those fronts. Food Bank UN, anyone?

Food deprivation was the key in Hitler’s master plan. Hungry people, busy digging dirt for morsels to stave off starvation, are too weak to fight back, and, therefore, no threat to overthrowing the powers-that-be.

UN dictators are blindly devoted to humanity’s destruction under the guise of “saving the earth”. The perfect instrument to achieve world bureaucracy is to send out enviro-pressure groups, represented by a million or so government-operated, non-governmental global organizations (GONGOs).

Gang Green disciples are not elected, nor accountable and answer to no one for their nonsensical orations, decisions and deeds, for which they are paid handsomely. What these gullibles don’t understand is that they, too, will be tossed in the dung heap just like any of Lenin’s “useful idiots” when their services become obsolete.

Thankfully, some astute politicians in many American states have seen the light emitted from their hoarded, outlawed incandescent bulbs. One by one, states are attempting to reject Agenda 21 by writing their own rules that protect their citizenry’s constitutional rights against this vast Marxist machination.

After Agenda 21 hid under the radar for nearly 20 years, moving seemingly in slow motion, in the year 2011 alone, some 54 counties and state legislatures started opting out of any Agenda 21-related programs. It took immense work, but they did it. Their further energetic resolve is to not stop until the pestilence is crushed.

I don’t see Canada or the European Union doing a damned thing to thwart this Agenda 21 pestilence…probably because all provinces, municipalities and politicians have been bought off.

Of course, these brave American states will face threats of federal government reprisals unless the “renegades” learn to “follow orders” and climb back on board the Agenda 21 happy train without sass.

If that doesn’t work, the Beltway Mafia, operating at the UN’s behest, will offer graft to local politicians as a means of “re-educating” them into changing the tunes they hum.

Some states and counties aren’t listening to the District of Criminal’s drivel; they are more mortally concerned about the final consequences if they continue to follow the doctrine laid out in the egregious Agenda 21 scheme.

For instance, the Oklahoma Community Protection Act,”, written as recently as March 2014, would prohibit any state agency or political subdivision from adopting or implementing “policy recommendations that deliberately or inadvertently infringe upon or restrict private property rights without due process.”

It would void any previous commitments which may have been made under Agenda 21 or a similar program: “any debt or commitment to an international or federal entity whereby the citizens did not have the ability to exercise their constitutional rights shall be considered null and void.”

Agenda 21 is a very serious threat. And the extensive work underway to frustrate Agenda 21 should tell any intelligent citizen, especially in the Western World, that this unofficial piece of trash is not a UN feature that government systems of any level should adopt.

Somehow, the world has survived the misery and grief of Marx, Lenin, Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot and a trainload of other tyrannical lunatics throughout history. There’s no reason to believe that the war these horrific Agenda 21 lunatics waged against the masses can’t be won, too.

The question is whether the world can survive the corrupt, deceitful, graft-infested United Nations that is more than 60 years beyond expiry date. This world organization is in dire need of being dismantled posthaste before civilization is destroyed by the lies of these chronic psychopaths who make cult leader and murderer Charles Manson appear sane.

As author T.E. Lawrence of Lawrence of Arabia fame wrote in the introduction to his book Seven Pillars of Wisdom:

”All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.”

The handful of parasitic, psychopathic, globalcratic despots-in-waiting, who control the UN’s upper echelon and are already squabbling over who will occupy the throne, are very dangerous men, indeed.

They act out their fantasies by day.

*******

 

The Banning of Everything

by Jane Gaffin

I am convinced that the supposedly not-for-profit GONGOs (government-operated non-governmental organizations) were designed to keep hapless, aberrant droneheads off the streets.

Since the year 2000, the 17,000 non-governmental organizations operating worldwide seems to have ballooned to over a million that comprise the rampaging army of untold numbers of social engineers who are trampling the rights and lives of ordinary people worldwide.

The communistic pimps at the United Nations need this astronomical number of doofuses to spread their evil like a dirty disease.

Like computer specialists are under pressure every year to dream up innovative apps the bosses can incorporate into computers or translate into new electronic gadgetry with which to bambozzle the buying public or be fired, the GONGO mouthpieces and so-called researchers must perform, else their senseless GONG show will be replaced with another senseless GONG show.

It takes a specific-type warped Marxist personality to wallow gleefully in propagandizing lies rather than spending time usefully ferreting out truth with which to educate the public.

This modus operandi has sent GONGO participants to coming up with worthless, absurd ideas with which to divert the malleable public’s mind from reality.

The GONGOers must wholesale whatever globaloney the United Nations and its proponents want dished out as socially-unacceptable. The politically-correct gospel is then sold to the obedient talking heads of corporate-owned media and to the grafted bureaucratic policymakers and politicians.

These illustrious apparatchiks eventually pass laws and filter the drivel through the channels where various governmental departments within the apparatus forcefully regulate their fiction with an iron fist.

Bans on perfectly functional or healthy substances and products–or tax them out of existence–seems to be the vaunted propaganda route GONGOs repeat to stay on the robust payrolls.

Although time-tested prohibitions have proven to backfire into immeasurable crime waves while blowing up in the faces of politicians at the polling booths on election day, they soldier on.

Innumerable countries over the centuries have followed temperance-league agendas into alcohol prohibition disasters on hackneyed excuses for curbing “excessive” drinking.

One way that notion crumbled was with a proliferation of hard-boiled gangsters sprouting up who controlled the illegal trafficking trade. It also spelled a loss of taxes. Due to elusive independent distillers busy under the moonlight proved difficult for revenuers to catch and shut down the operations. Meanwhile, many trusting imbibers went blind or died painfully from drinking contaminated co’n likker laced with anti-freeze or gasoline for “flavoring” or “extra kick”.

It is relatively recent history when American politicians were forced into an error admission. Within basically 14 years they lifted the national alcohol ban with the ratification of the U.S. Constitution in late 1933. What took them so long to learn? Politics and stupidity. But that hasn’t stopped the GONGOs from taking another jab at the beverage industry, both alcoholic and non-alcoholic.

A few decades back, a bunch of government-sponsored lackeys were funded to demonize, and eventually ban, coffee. One purpose was to eliminate the ubiquitous “coffee break”.

Besides inconveniencing millions of consumers who would have to convert from their beloved beverage to a ghastly-tasting wartime ersatz substitute, the cruel intention was to put the numerous coffee growers in developing nations out of business.

As a major cash crop and significant export product, coffee is one of the world’s most widely-consumed beverages and a very lucrative business. It represents over 50 percent of some developing countries’ foreign exchange earnings.

Why would the United Nations member states want to ruin that position for coffee-growing nations and their inhabitants? Without a cash crop to generate money, the coffee growers’ land would be expropriated and the farmers forced to flee into the unfamiliar ghettos without the necessary skills to find meaningful employment in an urban environment.

Sinking its claws into the coffee industry was nothing short of the United Nations’ sick joke to be played out by the controlling cabal of crazy, no-good, overly-rich, evil, corrupt, powermonging, megalomaniacal globalcrats who like to toy with their prey.

The mendacious propagandizers, or “useful idiots” as Lenin would have tagged them, tried to appease the UN by promoting coffee as a carcinogenic beverage.

It didn’t wash. The same bad-publicity campaign was tried against the chocolate industry. That campaign also whimpered out without leaving a politically-correct trace behind of any sinful side effects of chocolate. As with coffee, only the benefits and nutritional value derived from indulging in the ambrosial treat were reported.

I can only guess that the anti-chocolate GONG show must have been silenced under pressure behind the scenes and was replaced with some other ridiculous GONG show.

However, a second swipe has been launched on chocolate by way of sneaking in the back door with an attempt to ban sugar.

Without access to real sugar, chocolate and other industries would be forced to use harmful artificial sweeteners. And, in fine Agenda 21 blueprint style, the sugar-industry workers will be driven off the land and into the ghastly ghettos so the United Nations’ Gang-Green club can re-wild the planet.

The sugar industry, under attack a few decades ago, was running ads lauding the substance as necessary for energy and pretty hair. Eventually, the aggression spluttered and subsided. Everybody went back to business-as-usual.

Now the dimwitted enablers are back in full force demonizing sugar under the false premise that it causes diabetes which gives them the “excuse” to go after outlawing soft-drink beverages, too.

Sugar doesn’t cause diabetes; an ill-functioning pancreas not secreting sufficient insulin to offset the sugar does.

The cure for diabetes was discovered by Mayo Clinic researchers in 1970. I was present to experience the staff’s jubilation. Have you heard of Big Pharma manufacturing the cure? No, and you won’t. The avaricious pharmaceutical companies that don’t give a hang about your health would lose too much money on insulin.

The industry invented pre-diabetes, Diabetes I, Diabetes II and is working diligently toward “selling” the medical community on Diabetes III.

Soon, every patient will be diagnosed as diabetic and be prescribed pills whether the person truly has the disorder or not. To ensure the machinations work, Big Pharma bribes physicians with attractive kickbacks for willingly over-dispensing the drugs.

Can you smell “marketing racket”?

Neither does sugar cause obesity which is idiotically touted as a recent politically-correct disorder. It is not what you eat but how much you eat that causes fatness, you dummies. Most people are not overweight, despite the United Nations’ ruse of wanting the public to believe that everybody would be healthier if they were underfed so they can be poured into an emaciated Twiggy mold that exhausted its popularity rage in the 1960s.

I do not know with certainty what happened behind the scenes with the chocolate or coffee businesses. But I can extrapolate that the godfathers of the powerful coffee cartels issued stern warnings that if policymakers planned on taking coffee down Tobacco Road somebody was going to wake up dead.

The chumps wisely observed the “cease” and “desist” order. They shut up. Besides, the public weighed in heavily on this subject. Coffee became more popularized with the springing up of socially-embraced, franchise coffee shops that advertise many flavors of expensively-priced java concoctions and free wi-fi for computer buffs.

It would have behooved the magnates who are facing the threat of bans on tobacco, alcohol, soft drinks, milk, salt, sugar, Vitamin D, Canola oil, guns, lightbulbs, plastic bags, doorknobs, Christian Bibles–even sunlight, water and oxygen–and a myriad of other legal and natural products to investigate and engage in whatever tactics were employed by the coffee cartels.

Whatever was said, it worked. Researchers dropped the negativisms and now seem to be extolling only the virtues gained from coffee consumption. However, that didn’t deter governments. They have placed the onus for coffee consumption on the users through the socialized medical-and-mental health care services.

Without legal intervention of the courts, the overseers for Zero Tolerance on tobacco, alcohol and salt usage fall under “mental illness”. Since precipitated under the surreptitious Hillarycare days of 1993, the program has evolved into capturing uncooperative patients and locking them up as solitary-confinement prisoners and keeping them knocked out on dangerous psychotropics.

A diagnosis of “mental-illness” is synonymous with being labelled as a “potential domestic terrorist”. For example, paying cash to buy a cup of Starbuck’s pricey coffee is a definite indicator of a “mental disease”.

Why else would doctors, dentists and statistic bureaus ask if you smoke? Drink alcohol? Use street drugs? Drink coffee? Own guns? And wrongly accuse you of eating too much salty canned goods, butter and sprinkling too much salt on your meals?

Other signs of mental illness are body tattoos, hair died artificial colors, carrying backpacks, talking to oneself, eating meat, French fries, Campbell’s soup, fast foods…and displaying intense aggravation under grilling by nosey bureaucratic bozos on the subject of these type “substance-abuses”.

This is what one can expect as a fallout from socialized medicine. The “useful bureaucratic idiots” are mandated to carry out command-and-control over the lives of their patients who will lose all freedom of choice because Big Brother can make better lifestyle choices for them. In other words, these social workers are given directions to turn the Underlings into obedient state-controlled robots.

What else can be expected when the Marxist twaddle continually demands that governments set up this program; fund that strategy; ban this substance; do this, do that; gimme, gimme, gimme?

It seemed the Establishment surely had us under lock-down mode and civilization was truly teetering at the edge of the precipice. Then I read Brandon Smith’s uplifting words at Alt-Market.com.

“The establishment understands well that their criminality is clearly visible, and eventually, they will be personally subject to the rage of the people. The next fight could very well be the last for them.”

I can only hope the public is outraged in a hurry before the twits do any more damage banning everything in sight. The only thing that can stop the small but powerful cult of elitists from perpetrating their con jobs on us is for “we, the people” to stop them in their tracks with a “cease and desist” order.

It is incredible what these morons can dream up to keep themselves in the good graces of the United Nations.

Another proposal is to render air off limits unless individuals possess the financial wherewithal to pay the Gorey Gang-Green taxes on a “pay-as-you-go” scheme. If you can’t pay? The valve on your oxygen supply will be turned off by Smart Control.

The eugenicists will have a field day. Gore, a “useful idiot” in his own rights, also proposes an extra penalty for those who exhale CO2. Those who can’t afford to pay will be obviously banished from planet Earth.

This uselessness is nothing more than keeping the wheels of the money-grabbing United Nations extortionists greased at the expense of the Underlings who can ill-afford the nonsensical and unhealthy diktats. Yet it is surprisingly easy for the “esteemed” UN to keep finding eager puppets who can be corrupted with a relatively small amount of baksheesh.

It is past due for bringing on the outraged mavericks. The first item on the agenda is to dig into the rotten roots and ban the United Nations. This destructive, opulent, fat-cat organization has lingered more than 60 years too long.

Then, let’s get back to business-as-usual.

*******

What Happened to Our Freedom to Choose?

by Jane Gaffin

Freedom is supposed to mean the right for individuals to make choices without instigating any civil reprimands, as long as those personal choices don’t step on someone else’s toes.

However, scummy, despotic governments view individuality as dangerous. And with their political demagoguery autocrats are deftly crushing the citizenry’s freedoms of actions in front of their faces.

For the most part, people wracked with more fear than fight, don’t seem to give a whit about freedoms as long as they naively believe the governments aren’t goring their ox.

But those who aren’t paying attention painfully discover with time, it was their own personal inalienable rights that were stealthily chipped away until freedom to choose is virtually nothing more than one more constitutional corpse that didn’t survive.

Frequently, freedom-lovers allude to the famous “First They Came For” passage that refers to the dark 1930s, when Nazi Fuhrer Adolf Hitler was stoking up a full head of steam for his relentless rampage to enslave and conquer the world.

The chilling message penned by Lutheran clergyman Martin Niemöller profoundly warns of dire consequences awaiting those who do not speak up.

“In Germany, they came first for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist.

“Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew.

“Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist.

“Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn’t speak up because I was a Protestant.

“Then they came for me, and by that time, nobody was left to speak up.”

For some inexplicable reason man has a nasty habit of wanting to repeat history in the name of “progressivism”.

This makes Marxist “social reform” much easier to achieve for the powermongers who rule arbitrarily over people-control decisions handed down from the odious United Nations (UN) that spreads its dirty tentacles over the world by virtue of willing participants.

These powermongers are corrupt globalist ringleaders who prize collectivism over individual rights for the masses. They promote the politically-correct myth that the populace’s well-being and security can only be served from a top-down world government that is backed by heavily-armed world military and police forces to keep the masses in “peaceful” check.

That means individuals will not be legally allowed to defend themselves against blows inflicted by ruthless badge-bearing barbarians, regardless that self-defense–as well as defense of family, friends and home–is a natural instinct and a duty under God’s law.

What the globalists have in mind is called mass slavery.

Nazism didn’t die with the final stages of World War II in Europe, as is commonly believed. It was just getting a strong foothold worldwide with the advent of the freedom-sucking mentality at the United Nations.

Ordinary citizens, effected most by the treachery, are unknowingly footing the bills for the diabolical schemes of socially-engineering freaks who are dictating how to run your life. Yet there is no established mechanism for the tax “benefactors” to express outrage at the United Nations members for turning the world into a tyrannical nightmare from which civilization won’t be able to awake for more than a century.

Possibly, people don’t want to exert energy and take the consequences for making free choices. Or maybe it is just too scary to contemplate another Dark Age, and people are submitting fatalistically to the bad choice of “come what may”.

“Come what may” means their respective country’s identities, sovereignties, constitutions, currencies and freedoms have been gradually stripped away by ambitious globalist hustlers who do not want the masses voting. In a Marxist society, only property owners have a voice and only the upper echelon will be property owners.

By inserting altered passages into the “First They Came For” theme, it is easy to see how the cunning globalists, through brainwashing techniques, are successfully managing to repeat history by stealing individual freedoms before the masses fully realize what is happening.

First they came for the petroleum industry, and you didn’t speak up because you were against big business polluting and making profits, not thinking about where the crucial energy needs would come from until an appropriate energy-producing alternative could be developed.

Then they came for the fur industry, and you didn’t speak up because you weren’t a trapper whose livelihood depended on the markets and working on the land. Besides, you don’t live in northern climes and can afford to harbour a hatred for those who, out of necessity and resourcefulness, depend on animal fur and hides to make practical, warm, winter garments to survive the cold.

Then they came for the tobacco industry, and you didn’t speak up because you aren’t a smoker and hate those who are.

Then they came for the tobacco corporations’ rights to advertise and promote in print, electronically and on billboards or to sponsor whoever they choose, but you didn’t speak up because you think tobacco companies are disgusting and should be shut down.

Then they stripped the tobacco companies of their intellectual property rights, such as expensive packaging designs and logos which will render all tobacco packaging generic. Other type brand name products have already been replaced on store shelves as China-made generic goods. But you didn’t speak up through this whole transition because you don’t own–and don’t intend to own–any copyrights or patents and wouldn’t know what to do with them if you did.

The wisdom here is that once government goons establish precedent-setting law that grants them power to ban intellectual property rights, then a vehicle has been established to confiscate any and all of an individual’s intellectual, personal and fee simple property.

It means governments will own all intellectual property, including CDs, DVDs, books which will have to be purchased from Big Brother. Some of the proceeds will have to be confiscated to keep the United Nations happily operating in extravagant luxury since that corrupt international organization can’t make ends meet on membership fees, dues, special levies and taxing every worldwide financial transaction.

Everybody–especially the middle class which governments are on a rampage to destroy–will be caught in the grinders.

Then governments confiscated fee simple mineral claims, and you didn’t speak up because you’re not a miner or prospector whose livelihood depends on the land. Besides, you belong to the secular environmental religion that demands the Earth remain in a “pristine” state.

Gang-Green helpers and politicians are the types Lenin referred to as “useful idiots”. They are paid by one of many United Nations-funded NGOs (a misnomer for ‘non-government organization’) to espouse beliefs although they don’t have a click from a clue as to what the consequences would be should they completely thwart what they fanatically oppose.

Then they came for the forestry industry, and you didn’t speak up because you’re not a logger whose livelihood depends on the land and for the same reasons given above about “mineral claims”. Evidently, like with the petroleum sector, you gave no thought to how a paperless society could operate until a logical alternative could be developed.

Then they told the farmers how much land they could set aside to plant specific crops– as though the farmers are too stupid to know–and where and for how much to sell their grain, and you didn’t speak up because you’re not an agronomist. You also didn’t realize that the fascist governments were not only needlessly over-regulating the farmers but were taking bread out of your mouth.

Then they came for the farmlands, and you didn’t speak up because you were clueless that you depend on farmers’ earning successful livelihoods from the land. Yet you hypocritically rely on the foodstuffs that end up on supermarket shelves for you to buy on a whim.

Evidently you expect governments, which aren’t known for doing anything right, to operate and regulate Big Agra. Marxists also expect governments to expropriate corporate supermarkets which will be transformed into Food Bank America or Food Bank Canada or Food Bank UN or Food Bank Whoever.

The pitiful stock will be emptied from the shelves before long welfare queues can be given their meager daily allotted rations. Come back tomorrow and wait in line again all day. Repeat above scenario until you’re fighting in the streets to steal from a person who did get some food.

Then they came for the ranchers who depend on land to run their beef or sheep herds, and you didn’t speak up because you don’t believe in eating anything with a face. Perhaps you are a politically-correct vegetarian who is unknowingly bracing yourself for the pending potato and watery cabbage-soup diet that Big Brother’s Day of Reckoning has in store.

Also, the Marxist mentality believes land should be public domain and designated U.N. World Heritage Amebas that suck up national sovereignties like the free-trade agreements.

Then they came for the firearms, and you didn’t speak up because you’re not a gun owner and don’t like those who are. You stupidly advocated the United Nations worldwide ban on privately-owned firearms and ammunition. You stupidly believe the world military and police forces are the only “peacekeeping” protection people need to be “safe”. You stupidly forget that when governments are given carte blanche authority they will gleefully commit democide and genocide to rid the Earth of the “undesirable” overpopulation. Politically-correct “useful idiots” are on “the list”.

Then they came after the churches, and you didn’t speak up because you’re not a religious person and don’t give a hoot about encumbering your personal life with any principles remotely approaching a Golden Rule, Ten Commandments and Sermon on the Mount.

Then they took away 5,000 people’s mailing addresses in just one town, and you didn’t speak up because postal soldiers still delivered direct to your door weekdays and the post office wasn’t losing your personal mail. It didn’t dawn on you that the day would come when your mail delivery would be stemmed.

Then governments rubber-stamped one piece of sinister legislation, treaty and policy after another through the lawmaking factories and United Nations Councils that dictate what you can and cannot do with your property, how you will behave, what you can speak, write and think, where you can and cannot go to church or attend religious gatherings, what you can eat, wear and own, where you can live, and what you can buy.

You can only buy one type of China-made, mercury-filled, fluorescent lightbulb, hard on your health and eyesight, despite cheaply-priced, low-energy, rough-surface, incandescent bulbs have been developed and manufactured in the United States. But the governments banned them from free-market competition, and you didn’t speak up to any of these dictates because you simply weren’t paying attention that a lack of choice in lightbulbs is simply one more hatchet job against free choice.

Then the judicial commissars came forward with unfounded accusations. They charged innocent people unjustly in the courts, and you didn’t speak up because you selfishly didn’t care what they did to somebody else as long as it wasn’t your ox being persecuted and prosecuted. You didn’t realize you too are on “the list”.

The main clincher that will wipe you out like an unwanted grease spot are the bank “bail-ins”. You didn’t speak up against this legalized thievery because you have always trusted those so-called gold-plated institutions, especially in the Western World. You can’t fathom they would ever stoop to fraudulently stealing your deposits as well as valuables from your safety deposit box, Russian Revolution style.

The best two-step method for instantly freezing society dead in its tracks and destroying the middle class is to first seize all the people’s money and personal valuables, then confiscate their real property, most of which the banks own.

Governments of the world have united to provide so-called Economic Action Plans that are dead-ringers for establishing the United Nations’ dream of a totalitarian nightmare. It will instantly paralyze the mass population into serfdom.

Maybe you, like many others, are brain-numbed to the point of accepting globalist-think with the unwholesome attitude that “I survived the last inconvenience, I’ll survive this one, too.”

One day, they will surely come for you and your mind, for your intellectual, personal and real property, for your land, business, home, vehicles, money, and other valuables–even your children are not safe from these power-hungry gluttons. Marxists abhor the family-unit concept that does not recognize good parental direction in upbringing their own children. As Hillary Clinton nauseatingly stated: “It takes a village to raise a child”. That means placing your children under dismal government lock-and-key, command-and-control brainwashing tutelage.

You get the idea how the demonization game works. First, the globalists demonize and make products socially unacceptable through control of the corporate-owned mainstream media. Then, for your own good, of course, they go for a total ban which leaves you “free” from the burden of making choices.

If you no longer have the right to choose or to be left the hell alone, then you are no longer a free person, anyway.

As Pastor Niemöller warned, people cannot rely on others to fight their fight. You are personally responsible for constant vigilance in protecting your freedoms which are only yours until you let somebody else come along and steal them from you.

Yet it’s never too late to strike back against evil.

For starters, stewing behind closed doors isn’t going to do any good, as some industries discovered. You can, however, go on a crusade educating your friends and neighbours in short spurts at a time so they don’t think you’re as mad as a mercury-poisoned hatter. Blog your discontent to your heart’s content before the globalists seize the Internet or write opinion pieces to print newspapers.

Above all, support independent, locally-owned businesses with cash purchases. Let the owners know that you prefer buying commodities produced within the borders of your own country, region and community because you want to reject Chinese-made junk as much as possible.

*******

Mischa Popoff: He Can’t Be Bought

by Jane Gaffin

I confess that I haven’t been paying a whit of attention to the forthcoming British Columbia election scheduled for May 14th. Now, in view of the latest B.C. Conservative Party’s chicanery that saw it dump three candidates unceremoniously, I’m on full alert.

My interpretation is that the B.C. Conservative Party’s alarmist decision of April 25, 2013 to drop candidate Mischa Popoff in the British Columbia Boundary-Similkameen riding is a stroke of fortune for him as well as the electorate.

While being truthful, he ostensibly stepped on somebody’s tail which is illegal under the Human Rights Code of Canada. And, as we all know from Marxist vernacular and a recent Canadian Supreme Court ruling, “truth is non-defensible”.

Mr. Popoff said to the effect that single women make poor parents and the government-funded Missing Women Inquiry was a useless exercise.

In an April 26th e-mail, he chimed in with a detailed response about his views on the matter. And, as a woman who grew up in the comfortable surroundings of a family unit–and proud to have been housed, clothed, fed and educated on rewards of my father’s toils from tobacco, whisky, farming and construction–I agree with him:
 
“The Missing Women Inquiry was not only a complete waste of time, but was also an insult to all those missing women, their families, and all future women who might go missing,” wrote Mr. Popoff.

“Not a single cop was fired, reprimanded or demoted. Cops were fired when Robert Dziekański was killed with a Tazer. But 49 women go missing and turn up dead, and no one on the Vancouver Police Force suffers any consequence whatsoever. This is, I would argue, the definition of a waste of time,” he continued.
 
“We should not promote kids being raised by single parents. Kids are always better off with two parents, and it matters not what their genders or sexual orientation might be. Statistics show that mothers who end up single–through no fault of their own, either through divorce or death of a spouse–do well as single parents.

“My mom is one such parent. But mothers who enter into parenthood knowing they don’t have a spouse, this is very bad for a child’s upbringing,” Mr. Popoff concluded.

According to a three-sentence news release prepared by the self-vaunted B.C. Conservatives, whose campaign is obviously being run by a bunch of castrating women:

“Mr. Popoff’s various comments were insensitive and disrespectful, particularly to women and single mothers who are, in fact, heroes to their children and their communities in many cases,” it read.

“We are a party that believes in a respectful airing of views. Mr. Popoff’s statements were unacceptable and he has been removed as a candidate,” it declared with prejudice.

Good!

This means Mr. Popoff is free to run as a candidate under his own banner, which, according to B.C. political pundit Frank Hilliard in his latest offering Liberal Media Claims Another Scalp, is exactly what truth-telling Mr. Popoff plans to do.

Through an unexpected sandbagging, he is now shed of the B.C. Conservative Party, which is obviously a brainwashed group supporting the politically-correct Marxist manifesto, an ideology that has become too prevalent in Canada, as well as the whole free world, thanks to the useless, communistic philosophy flowing from the United Nations.

Marxism calls for the breaking up of the traditional family unit and the state raising the children as “good little brainwashed” Communists.

Marxists, Hitlerites and everybody of their political persuasion believe staunchly in the philosophy that the proletariats are good for nothing more than contributing their offsprings to the state and that wives are nothing more than sluts designed to offer sex-on-demand to their husbands.

Marx’s solution to the problem was through social engineering; dismantle the family unit by demonizing men and kicking them out of the household, leaving the mother to do the child-rearing until circumstances renders her so impoverished that the state can easily step in waving unconstitutional laws, seize the “neglected” children, then give them a cold, unloving Marxist-style education and one bowl of watery cabbage soup everyday for lunch.

This is where and how eugenics comes into play.

In my vocabulary, this whole scam stinks of creeping totalitarianism. Yet it doesn’t seem to be “creeping” so much recently as the world has become overwhelmed with one gigantic police state and only a few intelligent beings seem to be aware or care that nations have lost their sovereignties when the respective constitutions started to be ignored as the paramount law of the land because the United Nations wants to rule that show too.

When I read one of my favorite Canadian columnists Peter Worthington (Need for New Anti-Terrorism Bill is Clear, Sun News, April 24, 2013 http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/straighttalk/archives/2013/04/20130424-173629.html) falling into the trap of espousing an alarmist viewpoint with regards to lawmakers passing anti-constitutional legislation is OK, I wonder if everybody is so thoroughly programmed through the corporate media that no hope remains.

The Marxists have time on their side as an ace in their hip pocket. Those irritating traditionalists who believe in the constitution, freedom and families are aging and death will soon shut us up.

But the lurking problem is that a lot of people–some of them society’s useful idiots–are going to meet their demise, too, with injections for imaginary diseases or with other means and excuses, i.e., a bullet to the head because the killing camps are too crowded with nuisance, vermin-infested inmates and no “compassionate” state agent to feed them non-existent watery cabbage soup.

From what I know about Mischa Popoff through his writing, I’d say God just saved him from the embarrassment of aligning himself with a bunch of leftist goons.

Mr. Popoff is much better off without being yoked to the left-leaning B.C. Conservatives, which would do better at the polls if they starting talking and acting like Conservatives rather than just another brand of Marxists bent on destroying society and civilization.

Obviously the B.C. party is in lockstep with Harper and Company which is a lapdog eager to do the bidding for the United Nations that has won the Prime Minister an Internationalist of the Year Award.

I, for one, was not impressed with his globalist attitude and free-trade agreements any more than I was when he sent Canada running like a firehouse dog when the UN rang the bell for all NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) members to go bomb Libya, which wasn’t Canada’s enemy.

But all sane people who went to sleep at the switch are guilty for allowing the free world to disintegrate into the Marxist abyss. We stood silently by, allowing elected politicians, who ignored their constituents’ directives, to be manipulated by power elitists through acceptance of favors and graft that mostly flows from United Nations-funded GONGOs (Government-Operated Non-Government Organizations) and wealthy foundations.

I don’t mean to influence you, but if you are a Boundary-Similkameen resident don’t forget to exercise your franchise in favor of Mischa Popoff. He can’t be bought off.

*******